June 05, 2004

It’s a new month and I’ve made some good progress. I’m still in education mode and haven’t actually played with the composites yet, but I’ve placed an order with Wicks for a practice kit the RAF sells. I also purchased a book on composite construction. I’m hoping to learn a little more about Vacuum bagging and what that is all about. I’ve heard the technique can provide a reduction in weight and increase the efficiency and strength of layups.

 

COMPOSITE PRACTICE KIT & BOOK (CK) $49.95

Now available an introductory kit to answer your questions concerning composite aircraft. The kit consists of a book and sample materials, or purchase the book separately. The book "Moldless Composite Sandwich Homebuilt Aircraft Construction" consists of 26, 11 x 17 pages (equal to 52 pages) describing how the material is applied, education on the materials, tools required, inspection and repair methods. Sample materials include: foam (2 types), epoxy, glass bubbles, flock, peel ply, wire for hotwire saw, etc. Written by Rutan Aircraft Factory.

 

UNDERSTANDING AC COMPOSITES (UAC-1)  $29.95

Written by Zeke Smith. Provides basic understanding of composite technology prior to commencing a composite project. Describes Rutan moldless techniques, elementary theories of beams and sandwich structures, as well as vacuum bagging techniques for the homebuilder.

 

I’ve spent most of my Cozy time this month reading the newsletters. The time required to read them all is much more than I had anticipated. I’ve put almost 30 hours into reading these newsletters since my last website update. I’m presently on newsletter #72 of  #84. I’ve been reading chronologically so that it makes more sense to me and it’s been very entertaining watching the evolution of the community and the technology. I’ve been introduced to guys named Vance and engine developments sponsored by NASA which I’ll comment on later. I’ve watched the internet become part of the community also and really take off right around 1995.

 

It was interesting to note the early concerns by Nat and others on the quality of information being published. I’ve since signed up for Marc’s email list and must agree there is quite a wide variety of opinions in the email messages. One of the more interesting things to come out this month was the Cozy builders map that came out on Marc’s web site. I was surprised to learn of so many builders in this area. I guess I should not have been surprised considering the influence that Oshkosh must have on the nearby communities.  Aside from the opinions, I’ve made a few contacts through the list including contacting a local builder who actually wrote into the newsletter a few years ago. He’s on a business trip as I write this. We’ve emailed and discussed getting together with the local EAA chapter 129 here in Bloomington/Normal. As for the opinions, I’ve never been more convinced to stick to the plans.

 

Last month I ordered the “Building Rutan Composites” video and have since watched it three times. When I watched it I remembered seeing the faces of Rutan and Melville when I was 11 or 12 in Oshkosh with my father. My dad was talking to Melville near one of the composites. Seeing them cut foam and spread slurry brought back a lot of memories and images from when I was young and watching my dad build his Vari-Eze in the garage and in the downstairs living room. Aside from memory lane, the video really helped me understand the process and took some of the “fog” out of my mind about how this stuff actually goes together. For example, before I saw the video it was really unclear to me what peel ply was and how it factors into the construction methods. My dad had explained it and I had read about it, but seeing it actually being used really clarified the process. I’m hoping that meeting this other Cozy Builder and constructing the practice kits and chapter 3 exercises will finalize my basic building skills.

 

I’m really anxious to start building. The learning is talking longer than I anticipated and it’s going to take me another month to finish the rebuild on the suspension on the Beemer. I’ve removed all the core rear suspension components and found several blown out bushings. I’ve decided to take my time with the repairs and send the components out to be rebuilt with urethane bushings and have the metal components sand blasted and powder coated. That’s going to take another couple of weeks, but I’m into it deep now so I may as well finish the job right. I have a back room to the garage I can use to start the practice exercises and chapter 3, 4 and 5 so I don’t have to feel pressured to rush the job in order to get the car out of the garage.

 

There was a first flight report this month discussed on the boards about a guy that had a problem losing electrical power to his automotive engine on his test flight. The last two weeks have seen some very animated discussions on the topics of test flights, the demerits of auto engines and one humorous tangent about how to tie down a Cozy to perform a test run of the engine on the ground. I can’t say I read all of it, but there were a large number of people who expressed their appreciation for the person publishing the report.

 

I’ve set my first goal on the project. I’ve decided to finish the fourth chapter by the time I go to Oshkosh. I’m hoping my friend Mike will go up there with me. It’s been over 20 years since I’ve been so it should be an eye opener. Maybe I can even convince my dad to go with me.

 

To finish this entry, I took a cynical little journey into the world of engine development from the TCM/NASA GAP project mentioned in newsletter 56.

 

Izzy

 

Wednesday, May 26, 2004

This journal below documents my exploration of the details of a program mentioned in the #56 Cozy newsletter. OTHER ENGINE OPTIONS in the newsletter mentions a $9.5 Million grant to Teledyne Continental Motors (TCM) from NASA’s General Aviation Propulsion (GAP) program to develop a new motor. It became known as the TCM/NASA GAP engine. In this case I’m able to look up the results of this TCM project now in 2004 to see how it turned out and if the government money that was spent actually produced a viable engine. Ready to go solve a little mystery with me? Here we go…..

IC engine

First stop, what is it?….

I was pleased to find this presentation published on the internet that shows the tax dollars seem to be well spent to produce the 5-1a-IC Engine.

 

the smoothest and quietest piston engine ever flown in general aviation aircraft.”

 

 

Next stop, some practical questions…

How much and can I buy one and how much does it weigh? So far I’ve learned that is weighs about 300 pounds and puts out 200 HP, about the same as an Lycoming IO-360.

 

Let’s look on the Teledyne web site and see what we can find….

Well, the website mentions the engine but doesn’t offer it.

 

I’ll keep looking. Let’s go check out NASA….

The NASA web site says:

“GAP Diesel Engine Demonstrator Aircraft: The NASA General Aviation Propulsion Program aviation Diesel engine will be flight demonstrated on three aircraft: the Cirrus SR20, the Lancair Columbia, and the New Piper Seneca V. The NASA industry partner for this engine, Teledyne Continental Motors, will flight demonstrate the engine concept by the year 2000. They have committed to putting a new engine on the market, based on these engine concept demonstrators, within two years after the completion of the GAP program.”

So it’s now the year 2004. What is the status of the GAP Program?.....

The GAP Program ended in 2002. Questions about the status of these engines should be directed to: Williams International and Teledyne Continental Motors

 

Good news! According to the NASA quote, TCM committed to putting the engine on the market in two years….so where is the engine?

I went back to the TCM web site and didn’t see any references to it. It’s supposed to be half the cost. Half the cost of a new IO-360 would be $10K to $15K.

 

Let’s check out the Williams International site.

Nope, Gas turbines only.

 

Let’s go back to the TCM site and see if we missed something….

They say they have info on their proprietary TCM Link system, but the trail of the GAP engine runs cold at this link as far as I can tell.

 

Let’s see if I can get on the Link system and see if anything else is there.

“The annual membership fee for TCM LINK FBO Services is $240 and can be made in monthly payments of $20. But as an introductory offer, your first six (6) months of FBO Services membership is free!”  Well, I’m not going in there tonight.

 

Here is something…

CONTINENTAL EXAMINING MARKET FOR DERIVATIVES OF TCM/NASA GAP ENGINE

July 30, 2003 – (Oshkosh, WI) – Teledyne Continental Motors President Bryan Lewis revealed today that the company is studying its options for derivatives of the prototype, Jet-A fueled engine demonstrated under the NASA GAP program (NASA Cooperative Agreement NCC3-515) completed by Continental in early 2002.

 

"Our efforts related to our Jet-A engine have been on hold largely due to the recent difficult business environment and the resulting need to prioritize our R&D programs,” Lewis said. "We also question whether or not the 200-horsepower configuration of the prototype engine is the best for initial market introduction. There is a lot of potential interest in the 300-375 horsepower range and the engine configuration to address that range would benefit greatly from the experience we have gained from our work with the prototype configuration."

 

Accordingly, Continental has begun to visit potential OEM launch customers to determine their interest in a Jet-A fueled engine in the 300-400 horsepower category. The company is also conducting further tests of the GAP engine at their Mobile, Alabama headquarters, focusing on improving the engine’s turbo charging system. The current testing in Mobile will also evaluate the capability of the engine to run on a number of common heavy fuels.

 

That’s a disappointment. What working family man can afford an airplane that needs a 400 horsepower engine? Not many. I guess I though the point was to produce something that was affordable. You won’t be selling any in France. The GA horsepower limit is 200hp there.

 

Oh well. Guess I’ll be using a Lycosaurus like my great grandparents and their parents did.

 

I found this from the TCM Spokesperson…

"We believe the results of our efforts on the NASA GAP program clearly demonstrated the viability of the engine for production applications,” Lewis continued. "Our efforts now will be focused on where Jet-A products may fit within our other product lines and technology efforts."

 

 

So what other possible reasons are they are dumping it….the FADEC. Can’t sell those on a plane that doesn’t need it.

 

Teledyne Continental Motors and Honda Motor Co. announced, in March 2003, a joint feasibility study for developing a new family of four-stroke cycle HOAE. These engines have liquid cooling, a version of the TCM/Aerosance PowerLink FADEC engine-control system, and the ability to run on either 93-octane unleaded auto fuel or 100LL aviation fuel. A prototype four-cylinder engine, rated at 225hp, has been running for about two years and recently completed flight testing (in an unspecified aircraft) up to 17,500 ft. TCM and Honda have said that the engine family could be built in various sizes and numbers of cylinders from 4000cc to 9000cc (the range of all current TCM production engines except the O-200 family). References are FM6/03 and SA4/03, 9/03. A more recent source (KP1/04) gives the displacement as 370 cu. in., so limited information is given below under Continental-Honda OL-370 in Continental Part 2: O-315 through OL-1430.

 

OL-240 (2-S Diesel) -- {4.25 / 4.25 / 241.2} / {108.0 / 108.0 / 3952}

This engine is an important new development funded jointly by TCM and NASA under the Advanced General Aviation Transport Experiments (AGATE) consortium. The 1996 General Aviation Propulsion (GAP) initiative led to this engine, a turbocharged compression-ignition (Diesel) type designed to run on direct injection of Jet-A fuel. It was designed to run at a constant 2200 rpm with noise reduction and fuel efficiency as major design goals. Another design objective was a weight similar to that of a 360 cu.in. four-stroke cycle gasoline engine; i.e., about 300# (see Continental O-360, Franklin O-350, and Lycoming O-360). Experience with the Perkins Diesel Co. (see Continental O-201 (2-S Diesel)) presumably played a role in its development. The NASA contract was completed, but further development by TCM was discontinued.

4cyl; GAP; 200hp@ 2200rpm; 1996-2001; Wt = ~300#; TC = none.
SA6/00; TCM Web site under News
Turbocharged, direct-drive, liquid-cooled, two-stroke diesel engine.

Applications: (US) Cessna 337 testbed.

And the original questions….Weighs about 300 pounds and puts out 200 HP. TCM discontinued it in favor of other markets.

 

Bummer.