I started this entry on July 2nd. With the
holiday arriving, I haven’t been able to finish until now. Since the last time
I’ve written, I finished the newsletters. I’m impressed at how much time it
took to go through all of them.
Additionally, I’ve finished reading Zeke
Smiths Book and am happy to report that the $30 investment was sound. It’s
helped me understand the Spar and Spar cap, the reasons behind the various
shapes and techniques in structural design. I’m able to look at all sorts of
aircraft components and see the engineering in the design. The book also
touched on the different materials and helped explain why fiber glass is strong
and plate glass is not. In addition to learning about vacuum bagging I learned
about mold construction and mold making. It’s interesting to note that Aero
Canard is offering their molds for the Cozy for about $45,000. I would be
interested to see them sometime.
With my new found knowledge and advice from Mr. Maddy and others vacuum bagging has passed into the ideas
that will stay on the shelf for this Cozy project. The cost and weight savings
do not seem important in the case of this builders
bigger picture.
Since last update, I’ve finally purchased my original set
of plans. I was a little disappointed that I didn’t get Nat’s signature in
them, but perhaps I’ll get him to sign my owners
handbook at
My education continues with the recent purchase of the FAR/AIM
2004 edition. I’m hoping to get through that as I wait for a break in the
financial weather to continue building my Cozy. You’ve probably been wondering
why I’m still screwing around with reading and not actually building. The sad
truth is lack of funds. I spent everything extra I could spend (and then a little
more) getting the plans, some of the tools and parts for the Beemer. Of course the Beemer is still in the
garage, but now a little closer to the point I can begin reassembly. The major
undercarriage components have been powder coated (Red Baron Red of course!) Now
I’m waiting for about $800 in bushings and another $400 for miscellaneous
parts. It’s beyond the point of “is it worth it.” I have to finish it and get
the car back in running order. I’m betting it will be the end of next month
before I’ve gotten everything done that needs to be done on the car. Then I can
start construction.
So obviously, I’m not going to make Chapter 4 by
I’ve joined the local EAA chapter 129 and
have had the opportunity to meet some interesting folks. I’ve been cooking
pancakes on Saturday mornings and learning where all the cheap instruction can
be found. For example, I was informed of a local FBO that provides training in
a C-152 for $52 an hour. Some of the instructors don’t even charge. On the high
end, I’ve found a flying club that provides an airplane ownership for a $500
buy-in and a minimum number of hours per month.
I’m going to Oshkosh
and have convinced my Dad to come. We’re going to crash the place on a Saturday
for about 9 hours. I’m hoping it rains so the crowds are less and the heat is
less. We’ll see. I’m hoping we can go see the Rutan presentation on Private manned space flight.
Speaking of which, I should probably go check out the Scaled Composites website
to see why the tail cone buckled on reentry (if that’s what happened) and learn
more about the pitch trim freezing up. And how does this Feather work? I
wonder if he will publish that information.
Among the other details to be done this month include a
new flight medical and
a “getting back into it” flight for later.
To finish this month’s entry, I would like to include a
discussion on Brake Technology I posted to the newsletter board this evening.
It is my impression that the brakes and rotors that are available for the Cozy
were not designed specifically for canard aircraft. The following talks about
some of the technologies that could be incorporated to improve the margin of
error for Cozy Pilots and other Canard aviators who might land a little fast
and need some brakes on occasion.
Enjoy!
Izzy
Brakes…
Catching
Warbirds
I remember working as an End Of Runway (EOR)
specialist in the Air Force catching and disarming F-16's returning from
missions and getting a "hot pit re-fueling." Sometimes Pilots would
land with Mk-84 2000 pound bombs and near full loads of fuel for one reason or
another and use a lot of brakes on landing. One of the procedures I was
required to perform was to take a wax stick that melted at 700 degrees
and touch it to the brake rotor on the fighter after it landed. If the stick
melted I would test the rotor with a 1,200 degree melting stick. If the 1,200
degree stick melted the jet was parked to the side for 45 min or so until the
brakes had a chance to cool down. At that temperature, it could ignite fluids
such as fuel and hydraulic fluid. I had heard horror stories of Airman
approaching the hot tire from the side immediately after a pilot would land.
The rotors would transfer heat into the high pressure nitrogen that was in the
tires and cause the pressure to be so high that the hub would split in two and
blast the poor guy in half. The proper approach would be from the rear of the
aircraft under the wing. It was really hot under there with the APU and engine
exhaust and the hot tires. And a little scary of course.
Anyway, here is what I've learned about the topic of brakes. This was
prompted by a web discussion and the many other stories I've heard of struts
warping after hot landings and high speed taxies. Of course the best option is
to use the rollout all the way and not get heavy on the brakes. In an emergency
one could drop the nose gear.
So, I understand the presently accepted and recommended procedures and
limitations. I also know that people can get a little wired or excited and
maybe come in a little hot. It seems that recent technology advances in brake
technology should provide some options for our unique gear configuration that
could help us widen the gap between hot brakes and melting gear. Here is what
I've learned. Please forgive any plagiarism. I'm short on time and want to get
the info out. References and sources are posted towards the end.
Rotors and Heat
Rotors dissipate heat in two ways: Volumetric Displacement and Thermal
Dissipation.
Volumetric uses the mass of the rotor to absorb the heat energy. A larger
the mass of the rotor the more heat it can hold (to be dissipated in the
convection and radiation process). This is the only way that a solid rotor can
lower its temperature. Thermal dissipation uses a vented rotor to pump air
through the center of the rotor to reduce the core temperature. The number of
veins and their configuration is a major factor in determining how much and how
fast heat is dissipated. A vented rotor
also uses thermal dissipation.
Air Cooling through Vents
Vented rotors work by allowing air to enter the center of the rotor and sucking
that air through the interior of the rotor by the pumping action of the curved
veins (impeller action) in the rotating assembly. The first known use may have
been in 1966 on the Ford GT that won LeMans that
year. The primary types are the Pillar vane (comprised of many small posts) and
the Curved vane.
Temperatures between the pad and disc do not normally exceed 700F even in
heavy street use. In race use 900-1200F is common on smaller cars and in
Championship Cup race temps. shoot up to around 1500F
where discs will glow red or orange. As an educated guess, I suspect our Cozy
would probably not exceed 650 degrees. Anyone ever measure this?
Rotors made from carbon and carbon composites (formula cars) dissipate heat
rapidly. For a car, the changing torque output of the rotor varies widely with
temperature variations creating unpredictable handling for a car on a race
track. However, an airplane will stop from high speed once on landing and the
airplane does not have to repeat heavy braking such as on a curving race track.
Titanium or Carbon Ceramic rotors would be fantastic for aircraft applications.
These rotors are very light and are great for certain limited applications, but
are costly. The Titanium doesn’t dissipates thermal
energy as well as other metals.
Drilled and Slotted Rotors
For many years most racing rotors were drilled. There were two reasons -
the holes gave the "fireband" boundary
layer of gasses and particulate matter someplace to go and the edges of the
holes gave the pad a better "bite". Unfortunately the drilled holes
also reduced the thermal capacity of the discs and served as very effective
"stress raisers" significantly decreasing disc life. Improvements in
friction materials have pretty much made the drilled rotors less important.
However there are differing opinions. Brake warehouse reports that a properly
cross drilled rotor can increase cooling effectiveness by as much as 40%. In
terms of temperatures the claim is 200 to 250 degrees cooler. Most of today’s
racing rotors currently feature a series of tangential slots or channels that
serve the same purpose as the cross drilled holes. The tradeoff is that Cross
drilled rotors may be more likely to develop cracks between the holes.
A note about brake fluid boiling...
For applications where boiled fluid is possible, it's recommended the fluid
be replaced with at least a 550 degree non-silicone brake fluid and make sure
they are bled properly. Brake fluid is hygroscopic in nature - given any chance
at all it absorbs water. A fraction of one percent of entrapped water lowers
the boiling point of any brake fluid dramatically - and causes corrosion within
the system. Replace all of the brake fluid in the system at least once a year -
more often if you constantly use the brakes hard.
Coatings:
Swain Tech adds a Thermal Barrier Coating to various brake components to
protect and insulate various components and "wick" away heat to
specific parts of the braking system.
Conclusion
There seems to be technologies available to us that can reduce our risk and
increase the safety and utility of our aircraft braking system. Perhaps with
enough encouragement, the canard community can get together and encourage the
major brake manufacturers to adopt some of these very valid and well developed
technologies to help us improve our margin of error.
References and Sources...
http://www.thebrakeman.com/rotortech
http://www.stoptech.com/whitepapers/brake_systems_and_upgrade_selections_122701.htm
http://auto.howstuffworks.com/disc-brake.htm
http://www.brakewarehouse.com/brkewrhsefaqs.htm#top43
http://www.swaintech.com/htbrakes.html
H. Dittrich and R. Lang, Finite-Element
Analysis of
the Thermal Loads Acting
on a Passenger Car Brake
Disk, Automobiltechnische Zeitschrift, Vol. 86, No. 6,
pp. 265-269, 1984.
A. Fukano and H. Matsui, Development of Disc-
Brake Design Method Using Computer Simulation of
Heat Phenomena, SAE 860634, 1986.
G. Pigozzi and E. Ceretto,
Combined Thermal and
Mechanical Analysis of Truck Brakes, Proc 3rd
Intl’
Conf, Innovation and Reliability in Automotive Design
and Testing, Vol. 2, pp.
921-933, 1992.
A. Rinsdorf, Evaluation of the Energy Input in
Pad
and Disc During a Brake
Application, SAE 942086,
1994.
A. E. Anderson and R. A. Knapp, Hot Spotting in
Automotive Friction Systems, Wear, 135, 1990, pp.
319-337.
Kwangjin Lee and R. B.
Dinwiddie, Conditions of
Frictional Contact in Disk Brakes and Their Effects on
Brake Judder, SAE 980598, 1998.
Kwangjin Lee, Numerical
Prediction of Brake Fluid
Temperature Rise During Braking and Heat Soaking,
SAE 1999-01-0483, 1999.